Levine Finds Flaws in Graduate Education Programs
President Arthur Levine's research on graduate education programs found most suffering from irrelevant curriculum, low standards, weak faculty and little clinical instruction. In a report released Monday, Levine stated many programs are doing little more than dishing out higher degrees to teachers who are trying to qualify for salary increases. "The best chance we have is to scare the hell out of them and tell them the truth," he said about the colleges, adding their enrollment figures will drop as their credibility deteriorates.
Levine
recommended state intervention to shut down inadequate programs if
competition and self-monitoring do not spark change. He also
suggested having states and districts determine salary increases
according to the new skills employees demonstrate and not simply the
new credentials they have earned. The report is the first in a
series known as the Education Schools Project, funded by the Annenberg
Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
and the Wallace Foundation. The four-year study is based on
surveys of deans, faculty, alumni and school principals, along with 28
case studies of schools and departments of education.
The article, entitled "Study: School Leaders Poorly Educated," appeared in the March 14 edition of the Boston Globe.
Published Tuesday, Mar. 15, 2005